The hidden man of the heart is a secret thing that is being revealed AND every hidden thing is coming to the light AND as a man thinks in his heart so is he (right now) AND the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked AND among other things all "paranoid schizophrenia (noun) characterized especially by delusions of persecution, grandiosity, or jealousy and by hallucinations (such as hearing voices) chiefly of an auditory nature" AND some devil told him or made him do it AND the election of a black president is the catalyst for all this hatred boiling up to the surface of the Witch's caldron of evils from day one AND many blacks (especially youths) are paying the price of these demonic miscarriages of justice - regardless of age or gender AND America is living "A Nightmare of Reason" (“AND it was so.”) AND may God have mercy on the darkness! Whew.
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
When the U.S. aided and abetted the Iraqi president's (killed by US) use of chemical weapons against Iraqis, Kurds, and Iranians
Chemical Hypocrisy: U.S. Aided Iraqi Nerve Attacks Decades Before Outrage At Syria Attack | Alternet
Remember the days of the droning words, "... gassed his own people"? Now, the same US is planning to go against a Middle Eastern leader that it, along with Israel, has long wanted to be rid of. Yes, this is hypocritical for the United States because this country has and still does protect dictators, debauched leaders, and criminals from all over the world to further promote and protect "America's interests" (both economic and political). The weapons used were American weapons, whether chemical or conventional weapons of warfare. Case in point: "... it’s not Syria in 2013--it’s Iraq in the 1980s, and the U.S. was complicit in the attacks. In sharp contrast to U.S. outrage over the chemical weapons attack that Syrian government forces allegedly launched last week in a Damascus suburb, the U.S. aided Iraqi forces who used chemical weapons attacks during the brutal Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s (para. 2).
Unrighteous indignation is not pretty no matter whose face is on the portrait being viewed. In order not to thing things began yesterday or last night, J. Turley shows that it didn't: http://jonathanturley.org/2013/08/26/report-u-s-knew-of-saddam-husseins-use-of-chemical-weapons-and-supplied-intelligence-used-in-attack/.
Remember the days of the droning words, "... gassed his own people"? Now, the same US is planning to go against a Middle Eastern leader that it, along with Israel, has long wanted to be rid of. Yes, this is hypocritical for the United States because this country has and still does protect dictators, debauched leaders, and criminals from all over the world to further promote and protect "America's interests" (both economic and political). The weapons used were American weapons, whether chemical or conventional weapons of warfare. Case in point: "... it’s not Syria in 2013--it’s Iraq in the 1980s, and the U.S. was complicit in the attacks. In sharp contrast to U.S. outrage over the chemical weapons attack that Syrian government forces allegedly launched last week in a Damascus suburb, the U.S. aided Iraqi forces who used chemical weapons attacks during the brutal Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s (para. 2).
Unrighteous indignation is not pretty no matter whose face is on the portrait being viewed. In order not to thing things began yesterday or last night, J. Turley shows that it didn't: http://jonathanturley.org/2013/08/26/report-u-s-knew-of-saddam-husseins-use-of-chemical-weapons-and-supplied-intelligence-used-in-attack/.
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
So that's where Clooney gets his good looks from!
George Clooney’s Honest Family Connection | Ancestry.com
Well, he's not dark and stately as Abe was but Clooney is almost as handsome and stately as was his maternal half cousin five times removed.
Well, he's not dark and stately as Abe was but Clooney is almost as handsome and stately as was his maternal half cousin five times removed.
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
They are anybody's worst nightmare
http://www.alternet.org/belief/7-right-wing-christians-who-broke-same-sexual-rules-they-impose-others
Of course they do. That's one of their ways of atoning the deed without doing the penance. Instead, they substitute scapegoats. Of course they do.
Of course they do. That's one of their ways of atoning the deed without doing the penance. Instead, they substitute scapegoats. Of course they do.
Do not be deceived: this is America, not some third or fourth world country out yonder somewhere
http://www.alternet.org/dying-black-teen-denied-heart-transplant-due-partly-low-grades-and-trouble-law
Hear ye, hear ye. Now this is the moral, just, compassionate, pious, religious, Bible toting, Bible thumping, God is Love country in which we reside. This is our America:
"Fifteen-year-old Anthony Stokes has less than six months to live unless he receives an emergency heart transplant. But his family has been told that Anthony does not qualify for the transplant list because he has a “ history of non-compliance” — partly due to his history of
What generation would have very much to look forward to with our credentials. We had better take heed and not allow ourselves to be blind followers of the blind leaders, unless everybody wants to go to the Pit after all. I don't even know if it is possible for the unjust judges to feel any shame, being the Walking Spiritually Dead - so they could not care less than they do already what anybody says. The soulless ones have not the "Spirit of Truth" in them. These mutants have their Bible which of course is MUTE, so they love Its (the Book).silence where they are concerned.
Boycott the Russian Olympics - or Not
It has not been to long since DOMA was repealed. Also, for an example of why not to rush to rashness; today (8-13-13) LGBTs just got shot down again by policymakers who refused their petition for same sex marriage. Well, they refused to hear their neighbors' pleas because of some technicality - again. Since America is just beginning to try to put aside its own religious and secular biases against other people who have just a much a right to life (talking globally) as any other human being.
Some people come to terms with their disqualifications as judges over other human beings deeply personal preferences by just accepting that God mandates that we love one another. However, he did not say that we all must slide in bed with each other or sleep together to prove it.
If "Love covers a multitude of sins," it cannot create them simultaneously. Let US become more diligent in erasing the sins of our past and present, while Russia works on its own demons since we have too many demons ourselves and might get them all mixed up.
Some people come to terms with their disqualifications as judges over other human beings deeply personal preferences by just accepting that God mandates that we love one another. However, he did not say that we all must slide in bed with each other or sleep together to prove it.
If "Love covers a multitude of sins," it cannot create them simultaneously. Let US become more diligent in erasing the sins of our past and present, while Russia works on its own demons since we have too many demons ourselves and might get them all mixed up.
Monday, August 12, 2013
White people still try to usurp Native Americans' rights about their own children
Adoptive couple wants feds to bring girl to SC - Yahoo! News
Sometimes the Supreme Court does things like it deliberately tries to divide people. I think this is one of those times, once again.
Since local authorities in the states are subject to the federal authorities (FBI etc.), especially where white people are concerned, why would the Supreme Court put the responsibility on the states to decide where a Native American child should live if her biological family is alive and want here in her own "culture" and learning her own cultural history. Of course the state will decide for the white couple (at least this couple is not black, Native American, etc. meaning they must be white). This is another instance of white intrusion upon Native Americans where it hurts and where, with their words so far, the complainants threaten to "take the matter into their own hands if necessary." Very typical, very typical indeed.
This beautiful "Indian" child should have the right to be with her own parent, and her parent has the right to raise his own child - even if the "powerful" takes her from him, which the Law should not allow or it is just another "Indian" law or legislation that has no authority. People tout that children should be with their parents, then tout this: this child has a live father and should be with him.
Maybe the white people can give Veronica the world including love. However, she does not need the world, she needs her father and her ethnic culture and history (as her culture would tell it). What will count against this man (Dusten Brown, the real father) is that a white family wants to "take" his child while accusing him of kidnapping his child, and he is not a white or Veronica's mother is not white, but Native American. Even if the Council should rule in favor of the complainants, it would be the carrying out of a fishy "command" of some sort from some quarter.
Sometimes the Supreme Court does things like it deliberately tries to divide people. I think this is one of those times, once again.
Since local authorities in the states are subject to the federal authorities (FBI etc.), especially where white people are concerned, why would the Supreme Court put the responsibility on the states to decide where a Native American child should live if her biological family is alive and want here in her own "culture" and learning her own cultural history. Of course the state will decide for the white couple (at least this couple is not black, Native American, etc. meaning they must be white). This is another instance of white intrusion upon Native Americans where it hurts and where, with their words so far, the complainants threaten to "take the matter into their own hands if necessary." Very typical, very typical indeed.
This beautiful "Indian" child should have the right to be with her own parent, and her parent has the right to raise his own child - even if the "powerful" takes her from him, which the Law should not allow or it is just another "Indian" law or legislation that has no authority. People tout that children should be with their parents, then tout this: this child has a live father and should be with him.
Maybe the white people can give Veronica the world including love. However, she does not need the world, she needs her father and her ethnic culture and history (as her culture would tell it). What will count against this man (Dusten Brown, the real father) is that a white family wants to "take" his child while accusing him of kidnapping his child, and he is not a white or Veronica's mother is not white, but Native American. Even if the Council should rule in favor of the complainants, it would be the carrying out of a fishy "command" of some sort from some quarter.
Sunday, August 4, 2013
The peace that passes all understanding
Sikhs Plans Peaceful Memorial of Shooting By White Supremacist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4flGGVrWfts (Peace holy peace)
Because they are not happy, some people just cannot stand the thought of other people being happy. But they can be.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4flGGVrWfts (Peace holy peace)
Because they are not happy, some people just cannot stand the thought of other people being happy. But they can be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)