BEAUTY - AWE AND TERROR OF ISLAMIC MOSQUES

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/g-roger-denson/the-beauty-we-fear-the-gr_b_767566.htmlhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/g-roger-denson/the-beauty-we-fear-the-gr_b_767566.html


The Bhakti purported in the Works does not mean that type of "fighting" devotion I see as the Mars force (standing alone as religious activity with no good sense). That sentiment fights with closed mind (and eyes as well) about its faith and does not care to reason with anyone. Yet, it feels everyone should like what it demands they like, and do what it insists they do, religiously. 

Bhakti devotion (yoga) leads to liberation from "the fight" except for "the good fight of faith." I relate that love to Mercury (the Wisdom nature of devotion). Therefore, it is ever faithful to be unsullied in feelings and emotionalism that defies Spiritual reason, which is beyond intellectual reasoning (yet, of course, it is in company with Spiritual Reason).

Matt Kane: Iraqnophobia: The Political Tornado of American and Iranian Influence in Iraq's Parliament

Matt Kane: Iraqnophobia: The Political Tornado of American and Iranian Influence in Iraq's Parliament

Drunken diplomacy: new settlements - Opinion - Al Jazeera English

Drunken diplomacy: new settlements - Opinion - Al Jazeera English

Well, not only are Israel and America acting as a prostitute and a john; but this comparison is a drunk and an feeble enabler.   Although this of course did not begin with this administration, but some writers present it as so.   For example this article says that "Obama should ....  Which he should, being the present President of the United States.   Therefore, America has been the john ever since the beginning.  

AN LINE TAKEN FROM THE STORY:  "The only hope the Palestinians have is to do is change the script, to move away from a peace process system that from the start was rigged against them, and demand the establishment of a new political arrangement in the space of Israel/Palestine."  They should never have begun it under the conditions it did, but they didn't know it.  This document talks about Palestinian elite corruption - maybe - but corruption has been the name of the game and still is, so that word fits every accomplice, on all sides.

Israel's new citizenship law - INSIDE STORY - Al Jazeera English

Israel's new citizenship law - INSIDE STORY - Al Jazeera English

The KEY WORD HERE IS CONDITIONAL, as is all things concerning Israeli activity toward the Palestinians and the peace talks.  This is a subtle one, where Netanyahu puts forth that "he would extend the settlement restrictions in the West Bank--if the Palestinians recognize Israel as the Jewish State."  Now there is an ulterior motive here, I think.  Were it not, the offer would not have been extended.   It means something else since the Palestinians don't insist that Israel has no right to exist, but that Israel must afford their right to exist as a Palestinian State.  I believe it has something to do with the fact that Israel does not plan for the Palestinians to exist as a STATE because that means sovereignty. 

Were the Palestinians to become  a sovereign State, they would be EQUAL to Israel in that they too would be able to amass a standing army, air forces, navy, etc., which as it stands they do not have.    Israel never intends that to happen.  They continue to dredge up conditions that they know will impede peace talks.  Yet they present themselves as trying to work with all for peace. 

They play this game over and over, while America slinks in with goodies it promises to try to bring about what Israel won't do.  In this, Israel plays the prostitute and America is the John.  Therefore, they are both guilty - all they do does not work for peace but extends this unwinnable situation unless the dominoes played are changed.   When all get frustrated, they will then lay it on the Palestinians as the hold-outs, but in truth it is Israel, and America by extension.   They remind me of past times when they did the same to Arafat who was demonized by media, America, Israel, and any other parakeet in the mix.  suprised 

Really, yesterday's Arafat is today's Ahmadinejad - there must always be a demonized culprit, always.  Peace talks have stalled since 9.26.10, when the moratorium ended and Israelis immediately began building again.  Yet, I wouldn't be supprised if tomorrow or the next day or so, we will be told it's the Palestinians who somehow are stalling the peace process again.  Israel does not intend to pursue peace except its own kind of peace; otherwise the peace talks would have progressed and come to fruition by now. 

A KANSAS CHURCH PROTESTS AT MILITARY FUNERALS

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.allproudamericans.com%2FHarassing-the-Families-of-Dead-Soldiers.html&h=71b28    Supreme Court justices seemed troubled and divided Wednesday as they questioned whether a small Kansas church could be punished for mounting a protest that many found contemptible outside a military funeral. PROTESTS AND THE CONSTITUTION:  I agree as far as the right to free speech is concerned.  But people should be required to protest, not at the funerals, but anywhere else.  Preferably farther away from funerals than 100 feet, and out of sight of the event.  Freedom of speech does not give the inherent right to abuse the constitution when people find it suitable.  There is also this HUMANE thing called common human decency and respect for another's right to take care of its business, whether one agrees with it or not.


Just because one is against the war, does not give them the right under the Constitution to belittle those in the coffins no less, or to heckle their loved ones while they try to carry out the humble task of burying a fallen soldier.  If people cannot respect that really sacred task on their own, then the law should mandate that they do.  But on the other hand, someone will gripe that government interferes with ones' rights, even those mentioned.  Unless the law specifies the correct or desired procedure, this will continue to happen.  These people are mindless of the pain and trauma they cause with their thought, presence, and even more with the ugly signs they hold up.   Oh, but if the shoe were on the other foot.  What would they do if it were them burying a loved one, I wonder.

THE SUPREME COURT, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE PROTESTS.  At some point the Supreme Court will have to settle this issue - dividing the RIGHTS from the ASSUMED RIGHTS of the Constitution.  The constitution was never mean to use as a tool for violating other people's rights.  This that they are doing violates human dignity.  I don't the constitution should be used as a cloak for maliciousness, or to carry out malicious intent against any citizen.

THE MEDIA, ITS ROLE AS INFORMANT:  I must say that if we were without witnesses (media) about what's going on at a given time in this world, we would be a bad way.  We need media to bring to us things we would never know were they not there.  Many evils go undetected as it is; were there no media, we would not be addressing this issue - we would not know about it unless we lived where the events occurred. 

I think the Media (true media) should be commended and respected too.  Many journalist has given his or her life to bring to light things that are pertinent to our well-being, or to uncover the evils that go in in places high and low. 

Were it not for the media, we would not know what went on in Iraq on all sides (and we still don't know it all.  Media has been slain in order to keep news from getting to us).  We would not know that we have brothers in arms that need help of all kinds.  Enough of them are taking their own way out as it is.  We would not know the things they suffer while in combat and the aftermath - sometimes worse than the actual combat. 

WAR.  I have always believed the wars since 1990 were illegal; but this present administration inherited what someone else started.  I wish he (the President) would end it today - but someone somewhere would surely protest.  I hope the pundits are wrong in that they say we will be there ....  I still believe this war is detrimental to us and Afghanistan and hope that it will end soon.  But  remember, when talk of a pullout surfaced a while ago, not only certain of the legislators, but WE THE PEOPLE also, chimed in that it would be too soon and there would be other types of ramifications, etc.  Many cannot be pleased at the same time, we have proven that to be very true.

Ex-CNN host Sanchez apologizes for ‘inartful comments’

Ex-CNN host Sanchez apologizes for ‘inartful comments’

@ez: I support him too. I'm aware that people make audible mistakes - from the greatest to the least of us. But we must remember if we can receive it, when anyone mentions Jews except in PRAISE OF THEM, no matter how true it might be, that hundred-headed hydra whose code-word is "ANTI-SEMITISM" rears its ugly head and all sense of proportion goes out the window.

I was glad that when the Host finally gave him a word edge-wise, Rick Sanchez admitted that "bigot" was not an appropriate word because it was a wrong word. He admitted that Jon is not a bigot. That is never brought forth. It was totally overlooked (or dismissed) on THE VIEW also the following Monday. I was truly amazed at the dreadful negativity sent his way from those ladies on the show.

I thought to myself, "Surely these women in some way know how he could have got trapped in that ring where he really did not know he was going into." But when he realized it, it was too late. He couldn't get much else said as the HOST kept ribbing him about his statements about the Jews. There was no turning back because the host would not allow it. The Hydra had its way there.

THE ENEMY FROM WITHIN: WHY WE CANNOT FOCUS SOLELY ON ISLAMIC TERRORISM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-kane/the-enemy-from-within-why_b_746293.html

ACTUAL AMERICAN:     I am so glad I know the Lord and the Power of His Might, and he ALSO said, "No weapon formed against you will prosper" (even though it kills the body), because your rhetoric is very sinister and chilling (you arouse images of "The Devil's Rejects" mentalities).  I don't know who your response is to except the "YOU"; UNLESS it is to the writer who provided this link.  But I guess that would not be the case since apparently he is a "Muslim Humanist."  I thank the writer for sharing this link myself.  "FACTS" IS WHAT HE SHARES ABOUT WHO TERRORISTS ARE.  He didn't say it, he just shared it, I must say.  Also, he said "Peace" in three (3) languages, but you still reject THE FACTS.  I understand.

For those with your mindset, you must reject logic in order to maintain your own logic - that of lawlessness.  You try to convince people they are un-American, etc., by challenging them to become like you - lawless.  You want someone to validate you - your own kind will do that.  You use falsehood to justify "the makings of you"; but you fail to realize that it is yourself that people need protection from.  When you all get enough of yourselves revved up, ramped up, or amped up, who can protect the innocents from the likes of you, but the Good Law, terrestrial and celestial.

You are the sincerest frauds lumped into one country - you claim what is not yours:  freedom to be lawless; and get angry when someone thinks differently than yourself.  Your acceptance can only come from those like yourself.  You are fearsome and also fearful.  You advocate militancy, another type of separatism, warmongering, and any other negativISM aimed at overthrowing whatever your little minds deem necessary to be yourselves.  You love to batter the constitution, mutilating it in different dark places of your minds and call it good.  You say people feel safer because militias are a reality?  What people, except people like you? 

You want people to give their will over to your way of thought, you sound like a typical brainwashing agent.  May God have mercy on young impressionable minds you to which you might have access.  You accuse someone (the "You," which could be me) of not supporting the outlaws because of favoring the Islamist extremists.  I don't find a reference anywhere referring to a Muslim extremist, but extremists from within - ACTUAL AMERICAN(S).  But if you look in the mirror, you'll see the extremist staring back at you.  I ask you, what is the difference between you and any other kind of terrorist?  No difference, since all terrorists advocate terror and will die or kill anyone else to carry out its dastardly hateful activities.

I suggest the "smokescreen" is the irritant in your eyes that causes you to falter.  You talk about someone avoiding the responsibility of becoming like you.  That is their greatest shield, then.  We do not have a responsibility to become terrorists anywhere in the world; you don't either, you just left off the righteousness of God (right-mindedness) and went about to establish "their own righteousness" in whatever state you might live.

May God forbid that you'd have to defend me - that'd mean I am on your side.  So you and yours go on and think of yourselves as the power to destroy whatever you deem needs destruction, but just know you are said to be "a worm," "a vapor," and "altogether stupid"; God said it.

Howard Arenstein ARRESTED: Marijuana Charges For CBS Reporter & Wife Orly Azoulay

WASHINGTON — CBS Radio News correspondent Howard Arenstein has been arrested on marijuana charges in Washington. D.C. police spokesman Lt. Nicholas Breul said Arenstein and his wife were arreste...

@INTOLERANTCENTRIST: Bravo, mellow out isn't the need. Fair play is. That's why I don't care for insensitive jokes to this day: I'm a William Faulkner reader since a teenager. I learned more from Light In August and Intruder in the Dust than any face-to-face teacher could ever teach me (since I had not met my Spiritual teacher yet).Edit

WILLIAM PETIT TESTIFIES - ON TRIAL HOME INVASION MURDER

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/14/william-petit-testifies-i_n_716330.html 
I say wrong, a life is life, $ is $. We waste that on so much more. I'm for crime being paid for. Death does not pay for anything. Life does. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth will make a lot of people miss the mark when the time comes to tally up the chips. 

When we were told we'd be in danger of hell fire for calling unjustly a brother a fool, think what we store up for ourselves as advocates of DEATH FOR DEATH or whatever we want people to die for. Life is suffering - we learn by the things we suffer. 

I know Old Testament-minded people cannot accept that but the time will come when they will wish they did. If I believe one should die for the most horrible thing done, I might as well pull the plug on them myself; the judgment is the same. We are so steeped in the Judaism way of life we will be judged by that way of life when Jesus Christ (for all concerned) tells us to come up higher or depart from me ... I never knew you. 

At some point in time we must make a choice: are we Old Testament believers if we believe or New Testament believers if we believe. They both DO NOT MESH. Jesus said it and proved it. "You have heard it said of old ... but I say to you ...."