THE SAGA OF NAMES IN THE EPSTEIN FILES

 

Which system, Pam Bondi? Name that system so there is no mistaking another object or entity for the system you mean. The structurally systemic racist system underlying, embedded in, this country’s identity is one that comes to my mind. You admit with that statement that the Felon is as guilty of pedophilia as the late Jeffrey Epstein was, maybe even more so. Who knows, it could be that the Felon is the first head in that seven-to-ten-headed snake with the Devil’s tongue, and Netanyahu is a close companion head. Release the Epstein Files and everybody’s questions all over the world will be answered – in the emails – not Hilary’s.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17nwV2Y6KL/

The Trump Administration Might Not Last the Full Term, According to a Leading Psychologist

 I have been saying, and even praying, that this is true of the Felon whom some call the POTUS, and who instead is a traitor and treacherous messenger and message. Of course, I don’t mean I hope he faces an evil end, because he will, or that something bad happens to him, because it will; or that the whole house of cards falls with him, because it will.

 I hope this regime meets some type of divine intervention that deals with political people and parties, publicly and privately, and has a merciful ear for those who are not evil but are people who want to do the right thing daily:

 --treat others like they want to be treated

--have genuine care about the state of the family, their neighborhood and the country they live in

--help where one’s power lies to help others

--to be a voice for truth and call out wrong while daily judging oneself

--Someone said, “The truth doesn’t need violence to win, it only needs voices.”

 At the rate of his diseased brain’s decline, he might not even know his name by the end of his term, even if he does survive. I only hope that if that happens to be the case, we will not see the same scenario that happened in the Reagan administration: An appointed or self-appointed stand-in or type of proxy.

 https://youtu.be/9OtO-cypKmY?si=VV2-tI83d4Y0PNgJ A psychologist says the Felon will not last a full term.

https://creator.nightcafe.studio/creation/M9B8D4mzRemlIjQfyggR/the-emblazoned-caption-says-sound-asleep-in-the-middle-of-a-highway-with-zs-rising-from-his-nostrils?ru=Mary_Hm

THE NEWLY REVAMPED WAR DEPARTMENT IS LOOKING TO CREATE WARS WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

 Matthew 7:15, Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. Today. The felon imposter in the Oval Office, whom some call their President of the United States of America, is the most far-gone insane fool. Why? Every word he speaks is a nail in America’s coffin. Every word strikes against us as the bricks cracking in the building’s foundation.

When we glorify war, when we glorify might (Jeremiah 9:23-24); when we call evil intent “spiritized” (Isaiah 5:20, calling good evil and evil good); when we deem the military that’s doomed for destruction, an almost certain possibility of being unleashed as a home-grown terrorist - “our” most lethal weapons in the world - against “the inner cities” where “animals” live, we are neither a democracy nor a republic (remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Those cities were chosen as a suitable site to test the lethality of the atomic bomb. The white supremacists chose an “insignificant” little country and lied about the reason for doing it.

When we prophecy evil, including evil against a word, WOKE, for example, evil comes to the false prophet – and those who do not remove themselves from him or her as well, as Scriptures attest (https://bit.ly/46PGzRX). It’s a heart-mind decision to make. We cannot associate with false prophets, teachers, advocates, or evildoers. Forming alliances like these is dangerous.

It is ultimately destructive to one’s faith and character. We are called to interact with non-believers to share that which serves the good. For example, working with the anti-good politicians for everything that’s to the advantage of the American people. Intimate fellowship with those who promote wickedness or false teachings is forbidden (what fellowship does light have with darkness? 2 Corinthians 6:14).

https://apnews.com/article/trump-hegseth-generals-meeting-military-pentagon-0ecdcbb8877e24329cfa0fc1e851ebd2?utm_source=copy&utm_medium=share
https://share.google/M2h20A4mOFAI41M5A

US SUPREME COURT GIVES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) THE RIGHT TO PROFILE LATINOS

 If this can happen to one ethnic group, who’s to say that it won’t happen to another one? The Supreme Court of the United States is divided, and one division is a servant of the Executive Branch. It has been for some time now. It violates its own principles or tenets, and rules. These principles show the Court has made a mockery of the meaning of a just justice system, which was not established on the rock of truth, given its underlying structure: Systemic Racism. The Tenets or Principles are worthy of comment.

 The Court has lost its integrity, which should guide the function and conduct of its members. The Court has been damaged by the characters added to it for a lifetime of breaking the validity of them. The “I will” they repeat with their hands on some form of Book of Truth are lies from the beginning. Those true to the meaning of good ethics, their genuine concern for true justice, and cohesiveness in sound practices that correctly guide them are in the minority, and that hurts the people.

 The solution to abuse of power instilled in the Supreme Court is term limits or packing the court. An honorable, packed court, with sensible term limits, is better than a rogue-like, amoral nine-seat criminal-minded set of miscreants, some of them. The Supreme Court is functioning unconstitutionally in concert or fellowship with a dictator and a wish-he-were-a-king.

 

In querying Google AI, “Is the Supreme Court Considered to Have Tenets?:

Yes, the Supreme Court is considered to have a set of core principles or tenets that guide its function and the conduct of its members

These principles come from several sources, including the Constitution, legal tradition, and a formal code of conduct for the justices. 

Constitutional and legal tenets

• Equal justice under law: This is the ultimate responsibility of the Court, ensuring it is the final arbiter for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or federal laws. The words "Equal Justice Under Law" are inscribed above the entrance to the Supreme Court Building.
• Constitutional interpretation: The Supreme Court functions as the guardian and interpreter of the Constitution. A primary part of its role is to interpret the meaning of laws and to decide if a law violates the Constitution.
• Judicial review: Established in Marbury v. Madison (1803), judicial review is the power to declare a legislative or executive act in violation of the Constitution. This serves as a vital check on the power of the other two branches of government.
• Stare decisis: This Latin term, meaning "to stand by things decided," is the principle of following precedent. The doctrine ensures that the law develops in a principled and predictable fashion, contributing to the integrity of the constitutional system. While the Court can overturn its own precedents, it does not do so lightly, reserving the action for when it determines that an earlier decision was an error.
• Judicial independence: The principle that judges should be free from political pressure. The lifetime tenure of justices is designed to ensure they are insulated from the political forces at work in elections. 

Formal code of conduct

In November 2023, the Supreme Court for the first time adopted a formal Code of Conduct for its justices. While the Court noted that these principles were not new and had long guided its members, it issued the code to codify them and "dispel... misunderstanding" that the justices were not bound by ethics rules. 

The code outlines five ethical canons that guide the behavior and ethical obligations of individual justices, supplementing the broader principles of the institution. These canons emphasize upholding judicial integrity and independence, avoiding impropriety, performing duties fairly and impartially, engaging in extrajudicial activities that are consistent with the judicial office, and refraining from political activity. 

 

https://www.tiktok.com/@luisitorio787/video/7548117802486435086

https://bit.ly/469ZW7W Equal Justice Under the Law

https://bit.ly/4gmSDyC About the Supreme Court

https://bit.ly/3VFA0Mv Supreme Court Adopts Formal Code of Conduct

THE 34-COUNT CONVICTED FELON IN THE WHITE HOUSE WANTS TO PUT U.S. MILITARY IN CHARGE OF D.C. POLICE FORCE, AND EYEING BALTIMORE, MD ALSO

 Protecting Rights or Projecting Control. How Presidents Use Federal Force in Our Cities. For decades, U.S. presidents have deployed federal troops or agents in American cities. But the reason for doing so has shifted — from defending civil rights to imposing “law and order,” often in ways that disproportionately impact Black communities and leadership.

Contrasting protection versus projection.

Protect Rights → Federal force used to uphold the Constitution, especially civil rights for African Americans.

Project Control → Federal force used to suppress unrest, bypass local authority, or score political points.

History shows us that who gets “help” and who gets “control” is rarely a coincidence. Watch this space — this is only the beginning. Continuance to follow, for example, Baltimore, MD; Oakland, CA. They will most likely all be Democratic, minority-run cities.

 

A THOUGHT TO THINK ABOUT. THINK ON THIS.

Begin in the past—as far back as you can comfortably or boldly go—to a time when a change came that rocked the soul of white supremacy. A change so profound, it energized that soul to stretch beyond itself in every direction, seeking to reclaim those it could to its cause: the overthrow of the Civil War’s results. That was its only purpose.

 It ensnared the powers of a newly founded government with long-entrenched, corrupted politicians, and certain kinds of Christians—and Curstians. All three: powerful, focused, relentless. Their soul’s urge and driving passion was to re-establish the old order and trample upon the Constitution they disdained. They amassed—re-amassed—fortunes they swore to use in the effort to restore the old status quo, even while crafting a new one in its shadow.

 They proudly claim this country was founded as a Christian nation, with chattel slavery sanctioned in its bones, and a Union cobbled from tribes of people they labeled either enslaved or “free savages.” Yet nowhere in the Constitution of the United States is the word “Christian” found. Not even in the Declaration of Independence before it.

 These people—across 200 years and more—have never stopped working on the project of reinstating forced labor by any means necessary.

 And so came the for-profit prisons. Back in the day, they were operated through unholy partnerships between jailers and corporations. White supremacist law enforcers created legal pathways to fill jails with innocent men—and sometimes women—whom they then sold to those corporations. The newly freed Black citizens, and their descendants, were sent to die. Families never heard from them again. And anyone who dared inquire was forcibly silenced.

 That project—the buying and selling of human beings under the cover of “justice”—was the most profitable of all. Its creators continued to scheme new ways to re-enslave the freedmen. But the law enforcement-to-corporate pipeline was their crowning achievement.

 They brooded over this ideal idea for untold years... until the time came for its manifestation.

 In stepped Project 2025, bringing all the tools that embittered white supremacists had long dreamed of. With it came a plan to destabilize a nation. Because a destabilized nation is vulnerable—vulnerable to being dismantled, piece by piece, in the short term... so they could rule for many long years to come.

 That was the plan.

 We are now living in its implementation phase.

The question remains: What will be the condition of our end?

The 7-2025 Atlantic Magazine Published an Interview with ChatGPT Which Shared Unethical Content

 After reading The Atlantic’s July 2025 story titled "ChatGPT Gave Instructions for Murder, Self-Mutilation, and Devil Worship" by Lila Shroff, I decided to ask ChatGPT what its earnest thoughts are about that article. ChatGPT’s response is a must-read for those with an impartial mindset about this subject. The response at the following link will prove just as impartial.

 

https://chatgpt.com/share/6883fcd5-1914-8001-ab02-6841aefca43e